Rob Studdert wrote:
> I don't agree with this practice either as deep linking URLs displays the
> image out of context and may as well be construed as a violation of
> copyright. Also the fact that there is a copy of the image modified without
> consent being housed on their server is definitely an infringement. I bet that
> they would sue the pants off anyone who did the same to them :-(
It is a violation: they are using your images to sell advertising
banners. Without negotiating with you for commercial useage.
I just sent them a bill. I suggest that everyone else do it too. Make
it an extreme and unreasonable amount, and point out that it is so high
because these particular images are not for sale for commercial use.
Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at
http://pug.komkon.org.
