Jim Henderson posted on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:26:58 +0000 as excerpted: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:08:03 +0000, Duncan wrote: > >> Well stated... and you didn't even take the hundred lines or so to do >> it I likely would have. =:^) > > LOL > > It's an odd thing for me, because usually I'd have taken 200 lines to > say it. ;-)
Ahhh, but I see that had either of us actually done that 100+ line post, we'd have probably included the necessary detail that it's the match scores of -9999 ignored option, the /first/ time around. =:^) Which if you're anything like me, is why you tend to such long posts in the first place. Any time you go for the brief/short version, there quickly proves to be some missing detail, that takes one or more additional rounds of posts to work out... =:^( So by the process of negative reinforcement, we quickly find ourselves back at 100+ line posts again! Of course, from what I've observed, the folks that never do those long posts in the first place aren't held to the same standards, because nobody expects them to have the detail. But once you start, lookout, because now it's expected! =:^0 -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
