On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:46:34 +0000, Duncan wrote: > It showed up fine here, using gmane and "canonical" pan, that is, pan > from the upstream gnome svn repo from about a year ago, which would have > made it the same code as 0.133 I think, with a couple l10n fixes which I > of course don't use. > > So the problem is either in code from the patches added since then, or > in one of the libraries, probably gmime. Note that my version was from > before the patches for gmime 2.4 support, so I'm still running gmime > 2.2.24. gmime 2.4.x is not even on the system, tho Gentoo has it > slotted so it could be without interfering.
FWIW, I'm running 0.133 from the Fedora 10 repositories (not self built) and gmime 2.2.21 (also from the Fedora 10 repositories) and I cannot see the message in question (obviously as I'm the one who started this thread :-) ISTM that the fact that the message doesn't get permanently marked as read must be a bug in pan. Bruce -- +-------------------+---------------------------------------------------+ Bruce Bowler | An optimist is a guy that has never had much 1.207.633.9600 | experience. - Don Marquis bbow...@bigelow.org | +-------------------+---------------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
