On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:48:00 +0400, Roman wrote: > (You don't maintain that the early messages are _stored_ as UTF-8, > right?)
I haven't said anything about how your messages were stored on some server. But now you mention it, the early messages might well have been transliterated from Latin1 to utf-8 (and stored that way), and since they weren't intended to be in Latin1, they got turned into a mess. Why would they be transliterated with the incorrect assumption that they were in Latin1? Probably a default assumption for messages with no designated charset. (Those early messages did not have "charset=" in their headers.) Your later messages did have charset designations in the headers, either as koi8 or utf-8, and both come out looking like Cyrillic on my system. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
