Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:46:12 +0000:
> I'm not sure how categories would solve this problem. I could create a > "pan" category, but it would have only one group in it; likewise with my > Inkscape and GnuPG groups. At best, I would have a bunch of categories > with only one group each. It wouldn't directly, but it could by position. If you had just those three groups in a category, for instance, and they always appeared in the same order, then you'd quickly learn to tell which group you were in at a glance by position within the category. Get over three or four within a category, of course, and that gets a bit more difficult, but that's where the custom categories come in. You decide how you will use them and how many groups in a category, so you simply don't put more than three or four groups in a category, and vwalla, you can easily tell by category and position within the category which group you are in. In fact, at that point, the group names could all be displayed as "*" for all the difference it would make, since you'd be going by category and position. Still, the last two sections expanded thing is the more direct solution. I'm sure there are probably exceptions somewhere where the last two still don't properly identify the group, but they are few and far between, and in those few cases, position or other cues should supply the necessary clues -- or simply don't toggle on the abbreviated names. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
