Per Hedeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Csv4Me2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>On Monday 28 May 2007 23:36, Per Hedeland wrote: >[unsnip] >>>In this scenario, 0.131 throws up a single article in the header pane >>>immediately and then continues with the header download, and when all >>>headers are downloaded and sorted according to my setting (Subject) and >>>the header pane fully populated (much more than a screenfull), it takes >>>great care to have that first article positioned at the top of the pane >>>view - with the result that it's somewhere arbitrarily down in the >>>middle of the header list instead of at the top where I'd prefer to >>>start reading... > >>Saw that too, strange behaviour indeed! >>New pan's engine has stellar performance compared to old pan and that's very >>nice!! But the new user interface is definitely a wee bit less than old pan. >>Charles will work that out eventually, i guess and hope. >>No complaining here about new pan, great stuff. > >I'm not complaining, just kindly pointing out areas that could do with >some improvement.:-) I've been using new-pan for something like a year >now, and even contributed a few bugfixes. However this particular issue >would probably take me unreasonably long to track down - seeing that >it's comparatively new, the cause can probably be identified much faster >by someone who knows (or have done) the recent changes... > >Anyway, I have to say that I find it increasingly annoying - should I >file a bug report for it, or maybe there already is one?
Filed #445849. --Per _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
