Csv4Me2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Monday 28 May 2007 23:36, Per Hedeland wrote: [unsnip] >>In this scenario, 0.131 throws up a single article in the header pane >>immediately and then continues with the header download, and when all >>headers are downloaded and sorted according to my setting (Subject) and >>the header pane fully populated (much more than a screenfull), it takes >>great care to have that first article positioned at the top of the pane >>view - with the result that it's somewhere arbitrarily down in the >>middle of the header list instead of at the top where I'd prefer to >>start reading...
>Saw that too, strange behaviour indeed! >New pan's engine has stellar performance compared to old pan and that's very >nice!! But the new user interface is definitely a wee bit less than old pan. >Charles will work that out eventually, i guess and hope. >No complaining here about new pan, great stuff. I'm not complaining, just kindly pointing out areas that could do with some improvement.:-) I've been using new-pan for something like a year now, and even contributed a few bugfixes. However this particular issue would probably take me unreasonably long to track down - seeing that it's comparatively new, the cause can probably be identified much faster by someone who knows (or have done) the recent changes... Anyway, I have to say that I find it increasingly annoying - should I file a bug report for it, or maybe there already is one? --Per Hedeland _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
