On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:45:52 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's the intuitive explanation, but general sources seem to agree > that it's incorrect. [snipped main body] As this hasn't much to do with Pan, and was only roused by questions over Pan documentation, let me say (in the words of a minor television personality) "I reject your reality and substitute my own" :) It has to be left there, but I say again any documents that are generated need to be understood by the target audience and (since we live in a multi-national and multi-cultural society) shouldn't contain any explanations which when translated by software, shouldn't be too far of the meaning that the original writer intended. That's the ideal: try to get as close to it as you can. :) -- Graham
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
