On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 23:32:39 -0600 Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Jim,
> In total, I'm subscribed to about 170 groups - having all of those in
> one list would be problematic for me, both organizationally and from
> just a pure usability standpoint.
About 60 groups, in total, here. In the latest betas, I can view 45
groups without having to scroll the group list, which I dislike doing.
I keep sets of groups separate so as not to confuse me. It's mostly
historical, since I now have broadband, download time isn't really an
issue anymore. When I had dial-up, I kept the binary ng's in one set,
because I only loaded the headers, and then pick 'n' mis what I d/l'd.
With the text groups, I load headers and articles automatically.
Aggregated servers are fine. Just as long as I have the option to
select which one(s) I use at any given time. If this means different
user profiles, so be it.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
You never listen to a word that I said
Public Image - Public Image Ltd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
