On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:20:30 +0000, Duncan wrote: <snip>
> As I said, group state retention is IMO the biggest thing still lacking, > so should be top priority for 1.1. <snip> Yes, I would agree. I noticed the gap a few weeks ago when Charles added the ability to delete expired content. In text groups, it may not make sense to remove older content. In binary groups, it certainly does. Custom properties on a per-group basis would make Pan even better than it is today. Kevin _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
