https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2437502
--- Comment #179 from Nicola Taibi <[email protected]> --- Subject: [spacegl] Packaging fixes — rpmlint errors and warnings resolved Hello, I've addressed the rpmlint issues reported in the latest COPR build for the spacegl package. Here is a summary of the changes made: E: bad-manual-page-folder / W: no-manual-page-for-binary (errors and warnings) A man/man1/ directory has been added to the repository containing proper troff-formatted manual pages for all seven installed binaries (spacegl_server, spacegl_client, spacegl_3dview, spacegl_viewer, spacegl_vulkan, spacegl_hud, spacegl_diag) and for all three shell wrapper scripts (spacegl_server.sh, spacegl_client.sh, spacegl_diag.sh). Files are named with the standard .1 extension (no .gen suffix). Installation is now delegated to CMake via GNUInstallDirs (${CMAKE_INSTALL_MANDIR}/man1), which ensures correct placement under /usr/share/man/man1/. W: no-documentation for spacegl-data The %files data section in the SPEC file was missing a %license directive. This has been added (%license LICENSE.txt), resolving the warning for the noarch subpackage. Note on W: unstripped-binary-or-object Binary stripping is intentionally suppressed (%global __strip /bin/true, %global debug_package %{nil}) because spacegl_diag requires access to symbol information at runtime to inspect shared memory segments of a running server process. Stripping would break this diagnostic functionality. I would appreciate guidance if there is a Fedora-compliant way to handle this exception. Thank you for your time and review. Nicola Taibi Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ntaibi/space-gl/fedora-43-x86_64/10345911-spacegl/spacegl.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ntaibi/space-gl/fedora-43-x86_64/10345911-spacegl/spacegl-2026.04.19-0808.1.fc43.src.rpm Best regards, Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2437502 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202437502%23c179 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
