https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353415
Steve <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?([email protected] | |om) | --- Comment #19 from Steve <[email protected]> --- Phil, Thanks for looking at this package: * Are you thinking about packaging 'libgstroke' as separate package? No. Nothing upstream depends on it and it is stuck in an ancient version of GTK * Is the '%check' section going to be used to build tests the package or is this a long term goal? There are some tests, but they're graphical... Trying to figure out how to automate them. Should I just remove the %check section? * '%changelog', I would only have one entry for the re-inclusion into Fedora. Any other versions will not appear in Fedora, so are not really needed. Done New links: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/s-kro/libstroke/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10164671-libstroke/libstroke.spec https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/s-kro/libstroke/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10164671-libstroke/libstroke-0.5.6-1.fc45.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2353415 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202353415%23c19 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
