https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484

Richard Russon <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]



--- Comment #11 from Richard Russon <[email protected]> ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/flatcap/neomutt-test/fedora-36-x86_64/04502025-neomutt/neomutt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/flatcap/neomutt-test/fedora-36-x86_64/04502025-neomutt/neomutt-20220606-1.fc36.src.rpm

Sorry for the slow reply.
Things have been upstreamed and we're down to two Fedora-specific patches.

> > It's all gone OK, except for RHEL7

> it's ok to avoid EPEL7

Thanks.
Then I choose not to support RHEL7/EPEL7.
NeoMutt offers almost nothing over Mutt on that platform.

> I imagine you added `rpm --showrc` for troubleshooting

D'oh.  Removed

> Your multi-line configure is missing an escape

Fixed

> One more thing, please post revisions to the package as new
> `Spec URL:` and `SRPM URL:` lines (with working URLs)

Done

Thanks


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to