On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Gareth Nelson <gar...@garethnelson.com>wrote:
> > LL as copyright holder (or joint holder) can change the GPL with extra > restrictions as much as they like - so long as they make it clear. > > Sure they can, but they must call this license something OTHER than GPL. If they want to restrict freedoms granted by the GPL, then it ceases to be GPL and becomes a new beast. Licensing under GPL which LL has done in the past gives developers certain rights in the use of that code. Some freedoms and rights that the TPV curtails. LL is free to license their code however they want. What they can't do is gut the parts of GPL they disagree with and still call it GPL. By licensing the viewer under GPL and the preamble to the TPV seems to indicate this is their desire to continue to do so, implies a certain promise to allow certain things to be done with the software. If LL wants to restrict or take away rights granted by the GPL THEY MUST NOT CALL THEIR LICENSE GPL OR USE THE GPL PREAMBLE IN THEIR LICENSE. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#ModifyGPL -- ZenMondo
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
