Darren J Moffat wrote: > That wasn't where the thread started and I agree 'hg serv' is not > suitable for use on the big bad internet.
Ah, I think the thread was cross-posted half way through, I hadn't seen the earlier bits on opensolaris-code. > That doesn't mean the web interface to Mercurial isn't a very useful > tool though. > >> We don't just support Mercurial, we also support Subversion, and >> OpenGrok gives us unified access to both types of repository. > > I don't believe anyone was suggesting OpenGrok be replaced. And I didn't assume that was the suggestion. > Those of us asking for this are asking for a new service in addition. > Please don't drag every SCM system down to the lowest common denominator > that OpenGrok supports. As I said, please log RFEs for the missing features. > > If there >> are things that OpenGrok doesn't do which are required, please log RFEs. > > It isn't about what OpenGrok doesn't do it is about what it *shouldn't* > be expected to do. A web interface to the actual repo like what 'hg > serv' provides is used for different things to what OpenGrok is. And I've asked that these differences be captured in the form of RFEs, as per standard practice. -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
