Alan Burlison wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled - I didn't say that 'http wasn't suitable for > production use'. I was talking about 'hg serve', which is what I > assumed was being referred to.
That wasn't where the thread started and I agree 'hg serv' is not suitable for use on the big bad internet. That doesn't mean the web interface to Mercurial isn't a very useful tool though. > We don't just support Mercurial, we also support Subversion, and > OpenGrok gives us unified access to both types of repository. I don't believe anyone was suggesting OpenGrok be replaced. Those of us asking for this are asking for a new service in addition. Please don't drag every SCM system down to the lowest common denominator that OpenGrok supports. > If there > are things that OpenGrok doesn't do which are required, please log RFEs. It isn't about what OpenGrok doesn't do it is about what it *shouldn't* be expected to do. A web interface to the actual repo like what 'hg serv' provides is used for different things to what OpenGrok is. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
