Tx again 4 the support. The links are Good, it's a good start point. (I've built tons of packages from early 1999, I don't have any time to follow directly the building/testing stage of ldap cause of lack of time, I'll ask my boss to find somebody else that could do it) Michele Masè
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Nick Milas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/5/2012 10:23 πμ, Michele Mase' wrote: > > Sorry, I'didn't understand. Which should be better compile/build options? >> Michele MAsè >> > > From experience, I recommend using ready-made RPMs (or building from > SRPMs) rather than building from source. This way you can upgrade at will > and fully control your system in a way compatible with RHEL/CentOS package > practices. > > Of those I have worked with, I would propose you try using Symas Silver > (excluding syncrepl providers - if you cannot afford paid support - > otherwise check gold), or full-featured LTB project's RPMs (free, with > on-line issue system). We use the latter. > > Buchan's RPMs are fine too, but availability is sometimes limited and > updates slower. There are surely other RPMs and/or SRPMs around, but the > above are - IMHO - a point of reference for CentOS/RHEL. > > Discussion on how to use LTB src.rpm and openldap tar.gz source to build > Openldap RPMs is here: > http://tools.ltb-project.org/**issues/394<http://tools.ltb-project.org/issues/394> > > Regards, > Nick >
