Is it really bad? Is it buggy? Since redhat has its own ldap 389 dir. server, I suppose they don't care of openldap. isn't it? Michele Masè
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]>wrote: > --On Sunday, May 20, 2012 2:13 PM +0200 Michele Mase' < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Tx for the suggestion! We plan to migrate where possible to rhel6, that >> has included the 2.4.x openldap (and the possibility of hot adding ram >> and cpu in VM env). We have already tested a multi-master conf. that >> works fine. >> > > Using the OpenLDAP included with RHEL6 is a terrible idea. If you want to > use OpenLDAP as a server, then build it yourself, or use packages from any > of the numerous other sites that will build it out for you, so that you can > stay current. Distro packages are in general only for using the client > libraries. > > > --Quanah > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Sr. Member of Technical Staff > Zimbra, Inc > A Division of VMware, Inc. > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration >
