Hi all, Sorry to come back on this subject, but what is the current status of this request?
Do you need more background? Are you waiting for more opinions or a vote on this subject? Should I submit a v2 of this patch with what we have discussed to make it more polished for OE-Core (or another layer)? Again, sorry for the noise! Greetings, David 2014-07-28 16:42 GMT+02:00 Eric Bénard <[email protected]>: > Hi David, > > Le Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:15:12 +0200, > David Vincent <[email protected]> a écrit : >> > Why don't you use $BAREBOX_BINARY instead of hardcoding >> > barebox-flash-image which won't work on old versions of barebox where >> > barebox's binary is named barebox.bin ? >> >> I didn't know that, but I am not sure I can use $BAREBOX_BINARY since >> this variable is used in $DEPLOY_DIR. I tried to mimic u-boot recipe >> behavior as much as possible. >> > you can use the variable as it's defined upper. u-boot recipe does it > this way : > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#n19 > http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#n63 > > FWIW you can find here the initial barebox recipe we have in > meta-fsl-arm : > https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/tree/master/recipes-bsp/barebox > > Best regards, > Eric -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
