Hi David, Le Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:15:12 +0200, David Vincent <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Why don't you use $BAREBOX_BINARY instead of hardcoding > > barebox-flash-image which won't work on old versions of barebox where > > barebox's binary is named barebox.bin ? > > I didn't know that, but I am not sure I can use $BAREBOX_BINARY since > this variable is used in $DEPLOY_DIR. I tried to mimic u-boot recipe > behavior as much as possible. > you can use the variable as it's defined upper. u-boot recipe does it this way : http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#n19 http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc#n63
FWIW you can find here the initial barebox recipe we have in meta-fsl-arm : https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/tree/master/recipes-bsp/barebox Best regards, Eric -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
