On Monday 01 July 2013 09:52:42 Kang Kai wrote:
> On 2013年06月29日 01:16, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Secondly, although this seems to work the use
> > of overrides, += and ?= together is a little bit confusing. Perhaps the
> > following would be a bit clearer:
> >
> > PACKAGECONFIG_class-target ?= "aio \
> >
> > ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl',
> > 'acl', '', d)}"
>
> I considered this way.
> When 'acl' in distro feature, I want strace enable acl support. But
> PACKAGECONFIG could be overwritten that even 'acl' in distro feature but
> not in 'PACKAGECONFIG'.
I don't think this is a big issue - we have a fairly strong precedent for
doing it this way so that PACKAGECONFIG customisation overrides
DISTRO_FEATURES, based on usage in other recipes.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
