On 30/09/2024 11:23, Paul Barker wrote: > On 06/09/2024 14:48, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 23:40 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 21:21 +0100, Paul Barker via lists.openembedded.org >>> wrote: >>>> meta-ide-support:do_write_test_data dumps the bitbake data dictionary to >>>> a file using export2json(). As this obviously includes the value of >>>> MACHINE, and other MACHINE-specific variables, the recipe needs to be >>>> marked as MACHINE-specific. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb >>>> b/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb >>>> index d85aa120c08b..7ed422ce4ddb 100644 >>>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb >>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb >>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ >>>> SUMMARY = "Integrated Development Environment support" >>>> DESCRIPTION = "Meta package for ensuring the build directory contains all >>>> appropriate toolchain packages for using an IDE" >>>> LICENSE = "MIT" >>>> +PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" >>>> >>>> DEPENDS = "virtual/libc gdb-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} qemu-native >>>> qemu-helper-native unfs3-native cmake-native autoconf-native >>>> automake-native meson-native intltool-native pkgconfig-native" >>>> RM_WORK_EXCLUDE += "${PN}" >>> >>> Something about this is making our toolchain tests unhappy, e.g.: >>> >>> https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/42/builds/86/steps/12/logs/stdio >>> >>> I've not looked into it at all, just reporting what we've need to fix >>> in order to be able to consider merging this. >> >> It can be fixed with: >> >> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py >> b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py >> index ffe0d2604d1..5a17ca52ea1 100644 >> --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py >> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py >> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ class MetaIDE(OESelftestTestCase): >> bitbake('meta-ide-support') >> bitbake('build-sysroots -c build_native_sysroot') >> bitbake('build-sysroots -c build_target_sysroot') >> - bb_vars = get_bb_vars(['MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS', 'DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE', >> 'COREBASE']) >> - cls.environment_script = 'environment-setup-%s' % >> bb_vars['MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS'] >> + bb_vars = get_bb_vars(['MACHINE_ARCH', 'TARGET_VENDOR', >> 'TARGET_OS', 'DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE', 'COREBASE']) >> + cls.environment_script = 'environment-setup-%s%s-%s' % >> (bb_vars['MACHINE_ARCH'], bb_vars['TARGET_VENDOR'], bb_vars['TARGET_OS']) >> cls.deploydir = bb_vars['DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE'] >> cls.environment_script_path = '%s/%s' % (cls.deploydir, >> cls.environment_script) >> cls.corebasedir = bb_vars['COREBASE'] >> >> Whether that is a good/right fix, I'm not sure... >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> > > Hi Richard, Steve, > > I see this has been committed as 3be2bc8a9b0c in openembedded-core [1] > for master/Styhead. Thanks for fixing the test case and merging this. > > We saw the same issue when running yocto-check-layer in Scarthgap, do > you think this is suitable for backporting? > > [1]: > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=3be2bc8a9b0c9d6a178329c8b451a6bedf255d6c > > Thanks, >
Gentle ping on this - can the patch be backported to Scarthgap? Thanks, -- Paul Barker
OpenPGP_0x27F4B3459F002257.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#205910): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/205910 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/108292901/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
