On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 23:40 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 21:21 +0100, Paul Barker via lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
> > meta-ide-support:do_write_test_data dumps the bitbake data dictionary to
> > a file using export2json(). As this obviously includes the value of
> > MACHINE, and other MACHINE-specific variables, the recipe needs to be
> > marked as MACHINE-specific.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb
> > b/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb
> > index d85aa120c08b..7ed422ce4ddb 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/meta-ide-support.bb
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > SUMMARY = "Integrated Development Environment support"
> > DESCRIPTION = "Meta package for ensuring the build directory contains all
> > appropriate toolchain packages for using an IDE"
> > LICENSE = "MIT"
> > +PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
> >
> > DEPENDS = "virtual/libc gdb-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} qemu-native
> > qemu-helper-native unfs3-native cmake-native autoconf-native
> > automake-native meson-native intltool-native pkgconfig-native"
> > RM_WORK_EXCLUDE += "${PN}"
>
> Something about this is making our toolchain tests unhappy, e.g.:
>
> https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/42/builds/86/steps/12/logs/stdio
>
> I've not looked into it at all, just reporting what we've need to fix
> in order to be able to consider merging this.
It can be fixed with:
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py
b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py
index ffe0d2604d1..5a17ca52ea1 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/meta_ide.py
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ class MetaIDE(OESelftestTestCase):
bitbake('meta-ide-support')
bitbake('build-sysroots -c build_native_sysroot')
bitbake('build-sysroots -c build_target_sysroot')
- bb_vars = get_bb_vars(['MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS', 'DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE',
'COREBASE'])
- cls.environment_script = 'environment-setup-%s' %
bb_vars['MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS']
+ bb_vars = get_bb_vars(['MACHINE_ARCH', 'TARGET_VENDOR', 'TARGET_OS',
'DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE', 'COREBASE'])
+ cls.environment_script = 'environment-setup-%s%s-%s' %
(bb_vars['MACHINE_ARCH'], bb_vars['TARGET_VENDOR'], bb_vars['TARGET_OS'])
cls.deploydir = bb_vars['DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE']
cls.environment_script_path = '%s/%s' % (cls.deploydir,
cls.environment_script)
cls.corebasedir = bb_vars['COREBASE']
Whether that is a good/right fix, I'm not sure...
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#204268):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/204268
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/108292901/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
