On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:54:21AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 21 okt. 2011, om 09:34 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Richard Purdie > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 12:38 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > >>> * this way we can use > >>> EXTRA_DRIDRIVERS_armv4t += ",glamo" in meta-openmoko layer and > >>> EXTRA_DRIDRIVERS_armv4t += ",foo" in meta-bar layer without knowledge > >>> of other modules in other layers in stack > >>> * actually it's like old MACHINE_DRI_MODULES from OE-classic but renamed > >>> to indicate that it should be used for architecture not machine > >> > >> This is way overcomplicated. Just do: > >> > >> DRIDRIVERS_append_armv4t = ",glamo" > > > > Ah, is it expected that armv4t is no longer valid OVERRIDE? > > It is valid for angstrom:
I was thinking about adding the same to shr config.. but can I expect
that everybody who wants to use meta-openmoko will read README so
carefully that it will be enough to say
This layer depends on FEED_ARCH OVERRIDE?
Regards,
> koen@dominion:/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-ti$ MACHINE=om-gta01 bitbake -e |
> grep OVERRIDES
> # DISTROOVERRIDES=${DISTRO}
> DISTROOVERRIDES="angstrom"
> # MACHINEOVERRIDES=${MACHINE}:${@bb.data.getVar('FEED_ARCH',
> d,1).replace('all','noarch')}:${SOC_FAMILY}
> MACHINEOVERRIDES="om-gta01:armv4t:Unknown"
> #
> OVERRIDES=${OVERRIDE_THUMB}${OVERRIDE_INTERWORK}${TARGET_OS}:${TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH}:build-${BUILD_OS}:pn-${PN}:${MACHINEOVERRIDES}:${DISTROOVERRIDES}:forcevariable${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES",
> "thumb", ":thumb", "", d)}${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES",
> "no-thumb-interwork", ":thumb-interwork", "", d)}:libc-glibc:libc-glibc
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
>
> >
> > OVERRIDES="linux-gnueabi:arm:build-linux:pn-libdrm:om-gta02::shr:forcevariable:thumb:libc-glibc"
> >
> > #
> > OVERRIDES=${TARGET_OS}:${TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH}:build-${BUILD_OS}:pn-${PN}:${MACHINEOVERRIDES}:${DISTROOVERRIDES}:forcevariable${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES",
> > "thumb", ":thumb", "", d)}${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES",
> > "no-thumb-interwork", ":thumb-interwork", "", d)}:libc-glibc
> >
> > So I've to change it to
> > DRIDRIVERS_append_arm
> > or is it TRANSLATED_TARGET_ARCH fault?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
