On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:30:13PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 12:24 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > * this way we can use
> >   EXTRA_DRIMODULES_armv4t += ",glamo" in meta-openmoko layer and
> >   EXTRA_DRIMODULES_armv4t += ",foo" in meta-bar layer without knowledge
> >   of other modules in other layers in stack
> 
> Is this really better than using "DRIMODULES_append_armv4t = ..."?  

the point is that you don't need to know who is setting swrast there for
armv4t...

> 
> It's not really true that you can do it without any knowledge of what
> other layers are doing since if you end up with two competing
> EXTRA_DRIMODULES_foo overrides then one of them will get lost.
> 

so EXTRA_DRIMODULES_append_armv4t should be fine, right?

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: [email protected]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to