Op 19 jul 2011, om 02:30 heeft Xu, Dongxiao het volgende geschreven: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Mark Hatle >> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 11:30 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] udev: Change hard coded /usr/lib to >> support >> multilib >> >> Replying to myself.. sorry, I misunderstood the concern.. see below for a new >> explanation.. >> >> On 7/18/11 10:25 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 7/18/11 7:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> >>>> Op 18 jul 2011, om 09:08 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op 18 jul 2011, om 08:13 heeft Dongxiao Xu het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <[email protected]> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch | 16 >> ++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc | 1 + >>>>>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev_164.bb | 2 +- >>>>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode >>>>>> 100644 meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch >>>>>> b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch >>>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>>> index 0000000..c46ff4b >>>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ >>>>>> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [configuration] >>>>> >>>>> Could you explain why it's inappropriate for upstream but why we do need >>>>> it >> here? >>>> >>>> I asked the udev maintainer: >>>> >>>> 14:25 < koen> kay: the udev Makefile.am has 'ln -sf $(libexecdir)/udev-acl >> $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/lib/ConsoleKit/run-seat.d/udev-acl.ck', any reason for >> not >> using ${libdir} over ${prefix}/lib ? >>>> 14:29 < kay> koen: libdir is /usr/lib64 here, can't use that >>>> >>>> So upstream is aware of multilib, but wants to put these scripts in a >> non-multilib dir. Since I don't have any experience with the fedora/opensuse >> way of multilib nor the new oe-core one, could you please explain why oe-core >> needs this patch, but fedora/opensuse don't? >>> >>> This is likely a problem with the multilib fix. "libexecdir" is often >>> /usr/lib on many distribuions.. however as your other email >>> mentioned.. setting it to >>> /usr/lib64 is a mistake. It should be /usr/libexec or /usr/lib64. >>> All of the associated multilib packages should work correctly and no >>> conflicts introduced with this package (file contents should be >>> identical.) >>> >>> It should be permissible for libexecdir to be changed in the >>> configuration if someone really wants it to be. By default (in >>> bitbake.conf) it >> is: >>> >>> export libexecdir = "${exec_prefix}/libexec" >> >>> +- mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/lib/ConsoleKit/run-seat.d >>> +- ln -sf $(libexecdir)/udev-acl >> $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/lib/ConsoleKit/run-seat.d/udev-acl.ck >>> ++ mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/ConsoleKit/run-seat.d >>> ++ ln -sf $(libexecdir)/udev-acl >>> ++$(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/ConsoleKit/run-seat.d/udev-acl.ck >> >> I see libexecdir CAN be changed.. so the above is already possible.. >> >> The part they had hard coded is "/usr/lib/ConsoleKit"... There is only one >> location in the system for ConsoleKit configuration files/scripts.. and that >> is >> distro specific. Assuming the oe based distributions use >> $(PREFIX)/lib/ConsoleKit.. then the previous was correct. >> >> The point being it doesn't matter if it's 32-bit, 64-bit or 24-bit... only >> one >> ConsoleKit per system should exist. (There are potentially other files on >> the >> system like this. I know a recent RPM patch went in that separated >> /usr/lib/rpm and /usr/lib64/rpm.. this is also a similar mistake, I just >> haven't >> had time to get a patch out to revert that chunk.) > > So for multilib system, we have /usr/lib32 and /usr/lib64 to contain only > *.so files, while there is still /usr/lib directory which contains other > types of files, right?
That's how I read it, but again, I'm no (multi)lib expert :) _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
