Op 18 jul 2011, om 09:08 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven:
>
> Op 18 jul 2011, om 08:13 heeft Dongxiao Xu het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc | 1 +
>> meta/recipes-core/udev/udev_164.bb | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch
>> b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c46ff4b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-164/makefile.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [configuration]
>
> Could you explain why it's inappropriate for upstream but why we do need it
> here?
I asked the udev maintainer:
14:25 < koen> kay: the udev Makefile.am has 'ln -sf $(libexecdir)/udev-acl
$(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/lib/ConsoleKit/run-seat.d/udev-acl.ck', any reason for not
using ${libdir} over ${prefix}/lib ?
14:29 < kay> koen: libdir is /usr/lib64 here, can't use that
So upstream is aware of multilib, but wants to put these scripts in a
non-multilib dir. Since I don't have any experience with the fedora/opensuse
way of multilib nor the new oe-core one, could you please explain why oe-core
needs this patch, but fedora/opensuse don't?
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
