|
A few observations for the third Alan ;-] This first is pure opinion, and has nothing to do with technology: I think it's a long-term disservice to advise a recipient 1) not to reply directly to a message, 2) to say that such replies will not be read OR 3) use a sending address like "no-reply@"- AND THEN to actually attempt to handle "crazy people responses" after all. Much like some bacteria which develops a resistance to antibiotics through the actions of many, those crazy people develop resistance to the warnings - guessing that their responses actually WILL be processed - and by every one of us who also says that we won't. Thanks for that. If you're going to admonish people not to reply, then IGNORE their replies, dag nabit! Next, most modern MTAs will process hard and soft bounces back to the "From:" address, but will route hard replies (user pressed a reply button) to the "Reply-To:" address placed in the message header. No need for programmatic slight-of-hand on our end. Put the human address as a Reply-To. Last, when OpenBD reads messages out of our "bounce bucket" email account, legitimately bounced emails will be formatted with the daemon 400/500 message in the body, and the original message as an attachment. We peel off all the attachments and process those (they contain the original header, with the tasty trace variables we put in there when we first sent them). The FBL messages work the same way. That's all we've found necessary to maintain lists that keep the majors happy. We used to "read" the bounced message with some regex (to glean any emails that were literally cited), but found that it produced no better results than sticking with the attachments and ignoring the rest. I suppose we could forward any messages in the bounce bucket - that contained NO attachment - to some human eyeballs; but that would run counter to my rant above. Plus it would lead clients to think that we can catch and forward 100% of them. Finally, if users are self-subscribing to your list under opt-in compliance, it is NOT a good idea for someone to correct typos or process "my new email is" replies. The bad entry is going to die, and the user will likely replace it soon. If you correct or update bad ones, then users will have multiple good records in there, get angry getting multiple messages, and become a support hassle. I'm happy there are others out there who use OpenBD to process mail. It's got quirks, but works pretty reliably in a tight space. Al Holden On 10/1/2015 11:07 AM, [email protected]
wrote:
-- -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open BlueDragon" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: [OpenBD] Re: CFSMTP Mail delivery
'Alan Holden' via Open BlueDragon Fri, 02 Oct 2015 14:20:36 -0700
- Re: [OpenBD] Re: cfsmtp - having is... 'Alan Holden' via Open BlueDragon
- [OpenBD] Re: cfsmtp - having issues [email protected]
- [OpenBD] CFSMTP Mail delivery Alan Williamson
- [OpenBD] Re: CFSMTP Mail delive... [email protected]
- [OpenBD] Re: CFSMTP Mail delive... [email protected]
- Re: [OpenBD] Re: CFSMTP Mai... Alan Williamson
- Re: [OpenBD] Re: CFSMTP... [email protected]
- Re: [OpenBD] Re: C... [email protected]
- Re: [OpenBD] R... 'Alan Holden' via Open BlueDragon
- Re: [OpenBD] R... [email protected]
- Re: [OpenBD] R... 'Alan Holden' via Open BlueDragon
