On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM, CJ Carey <perimosocord...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll echo Marten's sentiments. I've found __numpy_ufunc__ as it exists in > the master branch to be quite useful in my experiments with sparse arrays ( > https://github.com/perimosocordiae/sparray), and I think it'll be a net > benefit to scipy.sparse as well (despite the unpleasantness with __mul__). > > -CJ > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk < > m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Chuck, others, >> >> A propos __numpy_ufunc__, what is the current status? Is it still the >> undetermined result of the monster-thread ( >> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5844 -- just found it again by >> sorting by number of comments...)? >> >> As noted by Stephan and myself when the decision was made to remove it >> from 1.10, for external libraries it would be really wonderful to have >> *any* version of __numpy_ufunc__ in 1.11, as it provides great beneifts >> (instant factor 2 improvement in speed for astropy quantities...). In the >> end, the proposals were not that different, and, really, what is in current >> master is quite good. >> >> All the best, >> > Well, I'm trying to gin up some action on the topic ;) The last time I brought it up it vanished into the mists. I don't think it would be a lot of work to finish things up and have comtemplated doing it myself if no one else steps up. I want to make the 1.11 branch this month whatever happens. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
