I'll echo Marten's sentiments. I've found __numpy_ufunc__ as it exists in the master branch to be quite useful in my experiments with sparse arrays ( https://github.com/perimosocordiae/sparray), and I think it'll be a net benefit to scipy.sparse as well (despite the unpleasantness with __mul__).
-CJ On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chuck, others, > > A propos __numpy_ufunc__, what is the current status? Is it still the > undetermined result of the monster-thread ( > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5844 -- just found it again by > sorting by number of comments...)? > > As noted by Stephan and myself when the decision was made to remove it > from 1.10, for external libraries it would be really wonderful to have > *any* version of __numpy_ufunc__ in 1.11, as it provides great beneifts > (instant factor 2 improvement in speed for astropy quantities...). In the > end, the proposals were not that different, and, really, what is in current > master is quite good. > > All the best, > > Marten > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
