On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Julian Taylor < jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Sebastian Berg > <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > > On Mi, 2015-06-10 at 21:03 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > >> > >> > > <snip> > >> > >> > >> * Relaxed stride checking will be the default in 1.10.0 > >> Is this still the plan? > >> > >> > >> Yes, but it won't be quite the same as the master branch. Currently > >> an unusual value for the stride (?) is used in order to smoke out > >> misuse, but that value will be more rational in the release. > >> > > > > +1, it should not be as bad/common in practice once rolled out. That > > said, I do not mind delaying things beyond 1.10, it might be better for > > compatibility if someone gets a new numpy on top of oldish other > > packages. > > So I am good with planning to go ahead for the moment. But if anyone > > complains, I would back down for 1.10 probably. > > > > - Sebastian > > > > With beside scipy.ndimage also opencv being broken I think we will > have to delay it beyond 1.10, though we should have at least an alpha, > maybe even a beta with it enabled to induce some panic that hopefully > will spure some fixes. > OpenCV shouldn't be broken any more if the merge this: https://github.com/Itseez/opencv/pull/4117 I would appreciate a second set of eyes looking over the logic in that PR. Jaime -- (\__/) ( O.o) ( > <) Este es Conejo. Copia a Conejo en tu firma y ayúdale en sus planes de dominación mundial.
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
