On Mi, 2015-06-10 at 21:03 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> 
> 
<snip>
>         
>         
>               * Relaxed stride checking will be the default in 1.10.0
>         Is this still the plan?
> 
> 
> Yes, but it won't be quite the same as the master branch.  Currently
> an unusual value for the stride (?) is used in order to smoke out
> misuse, but that value will be more rational in the release.
> 

+1, it should not be as bad/common in practice once rolled out. That
said, I do not mind delaying things beyond 1.10, it might be better for
compatibility if someone gets a new numpy on top of oldish other
packages.
So I am good with planning to go ahead for the moment. But if anyone
complains, I would back down for 1.10 probably.

- Sebastian

> 
> Chuck 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to