On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> >> Ralf, IIUC merging this and my other outstanding PRs would leave the >> datetime issues on python3/win32 as the only outstanding blocker? > > > Yes. There are some more open tickets for 1.7 (see > http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/report/3), but I don't consider any of those > blockers. Although #2078 should probably be fixed, since it's a regression.
I took a look at #2078 actually, and it's easy to fix: https://github.com/njsmith/numpy/commit/a0448b83e6b2efd981ef6ad6689b8b2fafebb834 But, because of all the churn in the reduction code that the separate-maskna branch has, I made that patch against separate-maskna instead of master. So, I'll wait to see how that shakes out before making a pull request for #2078. -- Nathaniel _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion