Le 3 mars 2012 10:27, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:34, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 14:31, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > >> Because this is also bad: > >>>>> np.<TAB> > >> Display all 561 possibilities? (y or n) > > > > Not as bad as overloading np.allclose(x,y,return_array=True). Or > > deprecating np.allclose() in favor of np.close().all(). > > I screwed up this paragraph. I meant that as "Another alternative > would be to deprecate ...". >
np.close().all() would probably be a lot less efficient in terms of CPU / memory though, wouldn't it? -=- Olivier
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
