Matthieu Brucher wrote: > > > I agree with you, the problem is that I do not use directly C > > functions and that I do not know how I can reproduce the result > with a > > minimal example. > Yes, that's why I suggested looking at the memory usage (using top or > something else). Because maybe the problem can be spotted long before > seeing it happening, hence having smaller code (which you could e.g. > post, etc...) > > > > For the moment nothing unusual, the memory use seems to be stable. > > > But if you can reproduce it with 128*128 images, then maybe it is > quick > enough to run the whole thing under massif ? > > > I'll try it this night (because it is very very long, so with the > simulator...) Yes, that's the worse cases, of course. For those cases, I wish we could use numpy with COUNT_ALLOCS. Unfortunately, using numpy in this case is impossible (it crashes at import, and I've never tracked down the problem; maybe your problem may be enough of an incentive to start again):
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2003-May/206256.html cheers, David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
