> > > I agree with you, the problem is that I do not use directly C > > functions and that I do not know how I can reproduce the result with a > > minimal example. > Yes, that's why I suggested looking at the memory usage (using top or > something else). Because maybe the problem can be spotted long before > seeing it happening, hence having smaller code (which you could e.g. > post, etc...)
For the moment nothing unusual, the memory use seems to be stable. But if you can reproduce it with 128*128 images, then maybe it is quick > enough to run the whole thing under massif ? I'll try it this night (because it is very very long, so with the simulator...) Thanks for the help ;) Matthieu
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
