Alan G Isaac wrote: >On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Sebastian Haase apparently wrote: > > >>Please explain again what the original decision was based >>on. >> >> > >I think the real questions are: >what do the numpy developers want in the future, >and what is the right path from here to there? > > > >>I remember that there was an effort at some point to make >>methods as functions more consistent. >> >> > >Yes, but my (user's) memory is that there were a couple >exceptions for historical reasons. As a user now of >essentially only numpy, I too would like to see those >exceptions go away, both for personal convenience, and for >the benefit of new users. > > >
I think we all want this to happen. I think we may have to wait until 1.1, however, to fix this issue because it is not technically a bug. It might be a good time to create the 1.0 branch and make the trunk 1.1 -Travis _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
