On 1/8/07, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan G Isaac wrote: > > >On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Sebastian Haase apparently wrote: > > > > > >>Please explain again what the original decision was based > >>on. > >> > >> > > > >I think the real questions are: > >what do the numpy developers want in the future, > >and what is the right path from here to there? > > > > > > > >>I remember that there was an effort at some point to make > >>methods as functions more consistent. > >> > >> > > > >Yes, but my (user's) memory is that there were a couple > >exceptions for historical reasons. As a user now of > >essentially only numpy, I too would like to see those > >exceptions go away, both for personal convenience, and for > >the benefit of new users.
Could anyone provide a complete list of the "couple exceptions for historical reasons..." mentioned by Alan !? -Sebastian. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
