Tim Hochberg wrote: > A. M. Archibald wrote: > > > [SNIP] > >> Really it would be nice if what vectorize() returned were effectively >> a ufunc, supporting all the various operations we might want from a >> ufunc (albeit inefficiently). This should not be difficult, but I am >> not up to writing it this evening. >> >> > You might want to look at frompyfunc: > > def expmave2(x, k): > def expmave_sub(a, b): > return a + k * (b - a) > return np.frompyfunc(expmave_sub, 2, 1).accumulate(x) > > > It's amazing what you find when you dig around. > I guess that this should have an astype since this comes back as an object array. It would be cool if there was a way to have it return certain types, just for efficiency reasons, but that would require actual work on someones part.
-tim > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
