On 1/9/26 11:13 AM, John Hubbard wrote: > On 1/9/26 10:59 AM, John Hubbard wrote: >> On 1/9/26 10:11 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: >>> On Thu, 2026-01-08 at 18:53 -0800, John Hubbard wrote: >>>> It may have its own imperfections, but this is *approximately* what I'd >>>> prefer (below). I believe that it strikes the right balance between >>>> simplicity and Rust idiomatic code--and it's not any larger than what >>>> you started with. >>>> >>>> And it won't cost you any time to implement, since this already works: >>> >>> Do you realize that this is almost identical to my V1 of this patchset? >>> We've come full circle. After chatting with Alex Courbot just now, we were thinking that we can debate these Rust abstraction improvements as future patches. Whichever way the debates go, I'm certainly OK with merging this working version asap, and making any changes in follow-up patches.
thanks, -- John Hubbard
