On Thu, 2026-01-08 at 18:53 -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > It may have its own imperfections, but this is *approximately* what I'd > prefer (below). I believe that it strikes the right balance between > simplicity and Rust idiomatic code--and it's not any larger than what > you started with. > > And it won't cost you any time to implement, since this already works:
Do you realize that this is almost identical to my V1 of this patchset? We've come full circle.
