vy commented on PR #379: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/379#issuecomment-2804224837
Although I can see the advantage (i.e., a PR touching to reusable workflows will directly get employed, instead of the one at `main`), I'm not keen on with this change for the following reasons: 1. Logging Parent uses itself to demonstrate how it should be used, see [its docs](https://logging.apache.org/logging-parent/usage.html). Using a specialized, say, `build.yaml` removes this convenience. 2. All `build.yaml` files are pretty much similar and this is very convenient for maintainers. This PR will create an exception for a small benefit in return. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
