ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #3338:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3338#discussion_r1898977120


##########
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/util/internal/instant/InstantPatternDynamicFormatter.java:
##########
@@ -515,83 +326,42 @@ private static List<PatternSequence> 
mergeDynamicSequences(
      *
      * <pre>{@code
      * [
-     *     composite(
-     *         sequences=[
-     *             dynamic(pattern="yyyy", precision=YEARS),
-     *             static(literal="-"),
-     *             dynamic(pattern="MM", precision=MONTHS),
-     *             static(literal="-"),
-     *             dynamic(pattern="dd", precision=DAYS),
-     *             static(literal="T"),
-     *             dynamic(pattern="HH", precision=HOURS),
-     *             static(literal=":"),
-     *             dynamic(pattern="mm", precision=MINUTES),
-     *             static(literal=":")
-     *         ],
-     *         precision=MINUTES),
-     *     composite(
-     *         sequences=[
-     *             dynamic(pattern="ss", precision=SECONDS),
-     *             static(literal="."),
-     *             dynamic(pattern="SSS", precision=MILLISECONDS)
-     *         ],
-     *         precision=MILLISECONDS),
-     *     dynamic(pattern="X", precision=HOURS),
+     *     dynamic(pattern="yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm", precision=MINUTES),

Review Comment:
   I refactored the javadoc in 
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3338/commits/07799647c5f381a9199f715b0e67bb563508c551.
   I believe that an example that uses the three implementation of 
`PatternSequence` has still a value: users can more easily get the whole 
merging picture, even if the merging behavior is delegated.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to