fluffynuts commented on PR #204: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/204#issuecomment-2476499427
> Hi all, I amended the csproj to use quackers by default, and it looks great (I'm a new fan!). As for Zarro, at the moment, the builds are taking longer with it than without it (especially for Windows, it's 2x longer), and there is this surprising requirement of having node/npm to build a dotnet project. Would going with Quackers and dropping Zarro be acceptable? Open to discuss @fluffynuts @FreeAndNil > > P.S. From now on, I will respond much more quickly. The _only_ problem that I can think of with using quackers without zarro is that the dotnet test system has a bug where it doesn't suppress all console logging, even when explicitly told to _only_ use quackers - in particular, you'll see failures twice, though the final stats and all output by quackers will be pretty-much the same. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org