fluffynuts commented on PR #204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/204#issuecomment-2476499427

   > Hi all, I amended the csproj to use quackers by default, and it looks 
great (I'm a new fan!). As for Zarro, at the moment, the builds are taking 
longer with it than without it (especially for Windows, it's 2x longer), and 
there is this surprising requirement of having node/npm to build a dotnet 
project. Would going with Quackers and dropping Zarro be acceptable? Open to 
discuss @fluffynuts @FreeAndNil
   > 
   > P.S. From now on, I will respond much more quickly.
   
   The _only_ problem that I can think of with using quackers without zarro is 
that the dotnet test system has a bug where it doesn't suppress all console 
logging, even when explicitly told to _only_ use quackers - in particular, 
you'll see failures twice, though the final stats and all output by quackers 
will be pretty-much the same.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to