meatballspaghetti commented on code in PR #5451:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/5451#discussion_r2045155834
##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/metadata/AccumuloTable.java:
##########
@@ -36,25 +36,39 @@ public enum AccumuloTable {
SCAN_REF("scanref", "+scanref");
private final String name;
+ private final String simpleName;
private final TableId tableId;
public String tableName() {
return name;
}
+ public String simpleTableName() {
+ return simpleName;
+ }
+
public TableId tableId() {
return tableId;
}
AccumuloTable(String name, String id) {
this.name = Namespace.ACCUMULO.name() + "." + name;
+ this.simpleName = name;
this.tableId = TableId.of(id);
}
private static final Set<TableId> ALL_IDS =
Arrays.stream(values()).map(AccumuloTable::tableId).collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableSet());
+ private static final Set<TableId> BUILT_IN_IDS =
Review Comment:
Now that you point it out, looks to me that the two sets are the same thing.
I must have been trying to do something new with `BUILT_IN_IDS` that I
abandoned and then forgot to delete the redundant set - or I just misunderstood
that `ALL_IDS` was only ever returning the enum tables in the first place. In
any case, removed redundant `BUILT_IN_IDS`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
