On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:47:19PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 03:24:43PM CET, a...@vadai.me wrote: > >This patch is based on a patch made by John Fastabend. > >It adds support for offloading cls_flower. > >A filter that is offloaded successfuly by hardware, will not be added to > >the hashtable and won't be processed by software. > > That is wrong. User should explitly specify to not include rule into sw > by SKIP_KERNEL flag (does not exist now, with John's recent patch we'll > have only SKIP_HW). Please add that in this patchset. Why? If a rule is offloaded, why would the user want to reprocess it by software? If the user use SKIP_HW, it will be processed by SW. Else, the user would want it to be processed by HW or fallback to SW. I don't understand in which case the user would like to have it done twice.
> [..]
