From: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@dev.mellanox.co.il> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:35:16 +0200
> BTW we choose the first option since the "buggy" function is called > "vlan_hw_filter_capable" which lead us to decide that the function > should be looking for ->hw_features and not ->features. > and i think this way it makes more sense. Again, anything doing checks on ->hw_features other than for the purposes of the validation of a ->feature change is a bug.
