On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: > Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:06:23PM CET, gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote: >>On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:48:38PM CET, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>>>>This patchset introduces needed infrastructure for link aggregation >>>>offload - for both team and bonding. It also implements the offload >>>>in mlxsw driver. >>I didn't see any changes to switchdev.h, can you elaborate on that please. > Correct. This patchset does not extend switchdev api. The extension is > done for netdev notifiers. It seems natural and correct. > As we discussed already with John on a different thread, it makes sense > for non-switchdev drivers to benefit from this extensions as well. This is understood. However, the point which is still not clear to me related to the LAG / switchdev object model. All of FDB/VLAN/FIB switchdev objects have corresponding software counterparts in the kernel --- what's the case for LAG? the software construct is bond or team instance, shouldn't there be a modeling of the HW LAG object in switchdev? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
