On Sat, 7 Nov 2015, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:57:34 +0100 (CET) > > >> > Would it be preferable to remove the macro entirely and inline the for > >> > loop header? > >> > >> Could you show me an example of how this would look exactly? > > > > One possible solution is below. I moved the initialization of the nh > > pointer inside the loop to reduce the size of the loop header. One could > > also inline fi->fib_nh[nhsel] where it occurs, but it seemed that that > > would make quite long expressions. > > Personally I like the explicit named iterator. It is descriptive and > tells that we are walking over all of the nexthops for a route. OK, I'll follow that solution. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
