On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 20:38 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr> > > > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:18:16 +0100> > > > > Move the variable declarations from the for_nexthops macro to the > > > > surrounding context, so that it is clear where these variables are > > > > declared. This also makes it possible to remove the endfor_nexthops > > > > macro. > > > > > > > > This change adds new arguments to the macro for_nexthops. They are > > > > ordered > > > > such that a pointer to the referenced object comes first, the index in > > > > the > > > > list comes next, and the list itself comes last, roughly in analogy with > > > > the list_for_each macros. > [] > > > > This patch takes care of a single file, where the macros are defined > > > > locally. If the basic transformation looks OK, I will change the other > > > > files that either likewise define their own macros or use the macros in > > > > net/mpls/internal.h. The potentially affected files are: > > > ... > > > > > > This looks fine to me. > > > > > > Please resubmit this when net-next opens back up, which should be > > > shortly after -rc1. > > > > OK, I'll do the others then too. > > If you do can you please parenthesize the macro arguments? > > #define for_nexthops(nh, nhsel, fi) \ > for (nhsel = 0, nh = (fi)->fib_nh; nhsel < (fi)->fib_nhs; (nh)++, > (nhsel)++) > instead of > for(nhsel = 0, nh = (fi)->fib_nh; nhsel < (fi)->fib_nhs; nh++, nhsel++) OK > And perhaps a renaming might be better > > s/for_nexthops/for_each_nexthop/ OK Thanks for the suggestions. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
